tech

Does AI Really Pollute? A Deep Dive Into the Environmental Impact of Artificial Intelligence

By Laurent Fidahoussen on December 15, 2025

The narrative that “AI pollutes” has become ubiquitous in tech discussions. But what does the data actually tell us? This article examines the environmental footprint of artificial intelligence through verified sources and recent studies, focusing on energy consumption, carbon emissions, and the broader systemic implications.

Global Energy Consumption: The Big Picture

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), data centers currently account for approximately 1.5% of global electricity consumption, totaling 415 terawatt-hours (TWh) in 2024. To put this in perspective, this is roughly equivalent to the annual electricity consumption of a country like Thailand.

Their carbon footprint stands at 0.5% of global CO2 emissions, or about 180 million tonnes of CO2. While these numbers may seem modest in the global context, the trajectory is what matters.

Projected Growth:

What makes this particularly concerning is that data centers are among the few sectors where emissions are projected to grow, alongside road transport and aviation. Most other sectors are expected to decarbonize over the coming years.

The United States: A Case Study in Concentration

The geographic concentration of AI infrastructure creates localized impacts that far exceed global averages. In the United States:

In 2024, US data centers consumed approximately 200 TWh. By 2028, AI-specific purposes alone could require between 165 and 326 TWh annually—enough to power 22% of US households.

Regional impacts are even more dramatic. In Ireland, data centers already consume over 20% of the country’s total electricity. At least five US states have data center consumption exceeding 10% of their total electricity use.

AI Query vs. Google Search: Understanding the Difference

One of the most cited comparisons is that an AI query consumes “10 times more energy” than a Google search. But this figure requires substantial unpacking.

Google Search:

ChatGPT Query:

The enormous variation in AI query estimates (ranging from 0.24 Wh according to Google’s Gemini to 3 Wh in earlier 2023 studies) highlights a critical transparency problem in the industry.

Why Does AI Consume More Energy?

The energy difference stems from fundamental architectural distinctions:

Traditional Search (Google):

  1. Queries a pre-built index of web pages
  2. Returns existing links and snippets
  3. Optimized database lookup operations
  4. Relatively static computational requirements

Generative AI (ChatGPT, Gemini, etc.):

  1. Generates original text token by token
  2. Uses models with billions to trillions of parameters
  3. Requires massive matrix calculations on GPUs for each response
  4. Energy consumption scales with response length and complexity

A simple, short AI response might consume 5x the energy of a Google search. A complex analysis or Deep Research query could consume 50x or more. The “10x” figure represents an average across various query types.

The Training vs. Inference Distinction

Understanding AI’s energy footprint requires distinguishing between two phases:

Training:

Inference (Operational Use):

Recent optimizations have significantly improved efficiency. Google reports that Gemini’s carbon emissions per query have dropped 44-fold over 12 months, combining both reduced energy consumption (33-fold improvement) and cleaner energy sources.

Water Consumption: The Hidden Cost

Beyond electricity, AI infrastructure requires massive amounts of water for cooling. The average data center consumes approximately 300,000 gallons of water daily. According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, a single ChatGPT query uses roughly 0.000085 gallons of water—about one-fifteenth of a teaspoon.

While this seems negligible per query, the scale matters:

Material and Manufacturing Impact

The environmental footprint extends beyond operational energy:

Critical Materials:

GPU Manufacturing:

A study on BLOOM (a 176 billion parameter model) found that embodied emissions from servers and GPUs amounted to 11.2 tonnes of CO2—less than half the 24.7 tonnes emitted during training, but still significant.

TSMC, which manufactures most AI chips, consumed 24 billion kWh in 2023, equivalent to 2.7 gigawatts of continuous power.

The Grid Impact Problem

The rapid expansion of AI infrastructure creates several grid-level challenges:

Energy Source Concerns:

Infrastructure Delays:

Economic Impact:

The Transparency Problem

Perhaps the most concerning aspect of AI’s environmental impact is the lack of reliable data. As noted throughout this analysis, estimates for a single ChatGPT query vary by orders of magnitude—from 0.24 Wh to 3 Wh.

Why Such Variation?

Most AI companies, including OpenAI, don’t disclose their emissions. This lack of transparency makes it impossible for researchers, policymakers, and the public to accurately assess the technology’s environmental impact.

California’s grid, for example, can swing from under 70 grams of CO2 per kilowatt-hour during sunny afternoons (when solar power is abundant) to over 300 grams per kilowatt-hour at night. The same AI query could have vastly different climate impacts depending on when and where it runs.

Corporate Climate Commitments vs. Reality

Major tech companies have made ambitious climate pledges while simultaneously expanding AI infrastructure:

Google:

Microsoft:

Meta:

Companies often claim “carbon neutrality” through purchased clean power credits or renewable energy certificates, while their actual local emissions go unreported or continue to rise.

Individual vs. Collective Impact

The environmental impact of AI presents a paradox when viewed through individual versus collective lenses.

Individual Scale:

Compared to major personal carbon sources (diet, transportation, home heating, flights), individual AI use is negligible.

Collective Scale:

The scale transforms negligible individual impacts into substantial aggregate emissions.

AI as Climate Solution?

Paradoxically, AI may also contribute to emissions reductions. The IEA estimates that widespread adoption of existing AI applications could lead to 1,400 million tonnes of CO2 emissions reductions by 2035—three to four times larger than total data center emissions in their high-growth scenario.

Potential Applications:

However, the IEA emphasizes there is “currently no momentum that could ensure the widespread adoption of these AI applications.” Without proper enabling conditions, aggregate impact could remain marginal.

Additionally, efficiency gains may be offset by rebound effects—for example, if autonomous vehicles make transportation so convenient that people drive more, or if improved building efficiency leads to larger homes.

Policy and Regulatory Response

Governments are beginning to address AI’s environmental footprint:

United States:

European Union:

Challenges:

The Path Forward

Several technical and policy approaches could mitigate AI’s environmental impact:

Technical Solutions:

  1. Model efficiency improvements (smaller, more efficient architectures)
  2. Hardware advances (more efficient chips and accelerators)
  3. Workload optimization (reducing unnecessary computation)
  4. Renewable energy procurement for data centers
  5. Waste heat utilization for district heating
  6. Liquid cooling systems (more efficient than air cooling)

Policy Approaches:

  1. Mandatory energy and emissions reporting
  2. Standards for data center efficiency
  3. Grid interconnection improvements for renewable energy
  4. Carbon pricing mechanisms
  5. Right-to-repair and equipment lifecycle extension
  6. Geographic restrictions based on grid carbon intensity

Market Mechanisms:

  1. Corporate accountability for Scope 3 emissions
  2. Investor pressure for ESG compliance
  3. Consumer awareness and choice
  4. Carbon labeling for AI services

Conclusion

Does AI pollute? Yes, unequivocally. But the answer requires substantial nuance.

At the individual level, AI use contributes negligibly to personal carbon footprints—far less than transportation, diet, or home energy choices. However, the sector’s explosive growth (+12% annually) at a critical moment for climate action creates systemic challenges.

Data centers are among the few sectors with rising emissions while most others decarbonize. Their concentrated geographic impact strains local grids, potentially delays renewable transitions, and may increase consumer electricity costs.

The greatest concern is not current consumption levels but growth trajectories coupled with profound lack of transparency. When estimates for a single AI query vary by two orders of magnitude, evidence-based policy becomes impossible.

AI simultaneously presents climate risks and opportunities. The same technology driving increased emissions could enable substantial reductions through optimization, efficiency gains, and scientific breakthroughs. Realizing the benefits while minimizing costs requires proactive policy, corporate accountability, and technological innovation.

The question is not whether we should use AI, but how rapidly we can decarbonize its infrastructure to match the pace of its adoption.

Sources: